<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Connected Educator: Has the US Dept of Ed Co-Opted Our Spaces?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dogtrax.edublogs.org/2012/08/03/connected-educator-has-the-us-dept-of-ed-co-opted-our-spaces/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dogtrax.edublogs.org/2012/08/03/connected-educator-has-the-us-dept-of-ed-co-opted-our-spaces/</link>
	<description>If you don&#039;t live it, it won&#039;t come out of your horn.  ~ Charlie Parker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 10:43:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://edublogs.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry Cecil Elliott</title>
		<link>http://dogtrax.edublogs.org/2012/08/03/connected-educator-has-the-us-dept-of-ed-co-opted-our-spaces/comment-page-1/#comment-8300</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry Cecil Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 19:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dogtrax.edublogs.org/?p=6284#comment-8300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find myself wondering what happens after this initiative is over.  Hey, it&#039;s great we get a whole month.  Wooptyshite.  Given the ease with which corporate interests can take over worthwhile initiatives (read CommonCore), I think Paul&#039;s question are on point.  They could have even stood to be a bit more pointed.  I felt the usual twice-removed abstraction that characterizes the bureaucrat who says they are only here to help in much of what Cambridge said.  I want grounded thoughts on &#039;connectedness&#039; not some rehashed social capital theory.  Is that too much to ask for?  

And I feel that same uncertainty you are sensing.  I will always be the first one at the meeting to ask, &quot;But where does this take us?&quot;  I too worry that many teachers, sensing a groundswell of federal action, will simply let &#039;Obama&#039; do it.  But let us not forget that it was this Department of Ed that very effectively lopped of half or more of the National Writing Project&#039;s budget.  I will tell you exactly what that meant to the connectedness of the writing project I work with--we served half the number of writing fellows this summer.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find myself wondering what happens after this initiative is over.  Hey, it&#8217;s great we get a whole month.  Wooptyshite.  Given the ease with which corporate interests can take over worthwhile initiatives (read CommonCore), I think Paul&#8217;s question are on point.  They could have even stood to be a bit more pointed.  I felt the usual twice-removed abstraction that characterizes the bureaucrat who says they are only here to help in much of what Cambridge said.  I want grounded thoughts on &#8216;connectedness&#8217; not some rehashed social capital theory.  Is that too much to ask for?  </p>
<p>And I feel that same uncertainty you are sensing.  I will always be the first one at the meeting to ask, &#8220;But where does this take us?&#8221;  I too worry that many teachers, sensing a groundswell of federal action, will simply let &#8216;Obama&#8217; do it.  But let us not forget that it was this Department of Ed that very effectively lopped of half or more of the National Writing Project&#8217;s budget.  I will tell you exactly what that meant to the connectedness of the writing project I work with&#8211;we served half the number of writing fellows this summer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
