Three Poem Generation: An AI Chatbot Platform Jump

Bird Music by DALL·E

Bird Music created by DALL-E

I tried an experiment that sort of pits different Artificial Intelligence Chatbots against each other through poetry and revision, asking one Chat to revise the work of another Chat, and seeing where the words would go.

First, I used a site called AI Poem Generator and gave it a general prompt with no further instructions:

Write a poem about listening to birds on a Spring morning.

The results from AI Poem Generator:

As I awaken to the dawn’s soft light,
The sweet sounds of spring take flight,
Birds outside my window singing with glee,
Making their sweet melody for all to see.

Chirping, trilling, and tweets,
Echoing through the morning streets,
Melodies of hope, love and bliss,
On this spring morning, nothing’s amiss.

Their songs fill my heart with joy,
As I listen to them without any ploy,
I watch them flutter, chirp and sway,
On this perfect spring morning, starting my day.

With each whistle, hum, and tune,
I feel like I’m in an enchanted cocoon,
Their songs a symphony so divine,
A true work of Mother Nature’s design.

So I close my eyes and take it all in,
A spring morning such a beautiful spin,
I thank the birds for their sweet melody,
And for bringing such joy and harmony.

Reflection: I wasn’t all that impressed and the rhymes for the couplets really seemed forced to me, particularly as I read the stanzas aloud. And phrases like “enchanted cocoon” and “any ploy” seemed really jarring to my ears. This definitely felt like a rhyming dictionary was at work, composing verse.

I took that poem and asked ChatGPT to revise it for me, which it did.

The results from ChatGPT:

As I awaken to the gentle light of dawn,
The springtime sounds, a melodic fawn,
Birds outside my window, singing with glee,
Their symphony of melodies, for all to see.

Chirping, trilling, and tweeting so bright,
Echoing through the streets in sheer delight,
Notes of hope, love, and pure bliss,
On this spring morning, nature’s perfect kiss.

Their songs fill my heart with boundless joy,
As I listen without any ploy,
I watch them flutter, chirp, and sway,
Starting my day in nature’s grand display.

With each whistle, hum, and sweet tune,
I feel embraced in an enchanted cocoon,
Their melodies, a symphony divine,
A masterpiece of Mother Nature’s design.

So I close my eyes and take it all in,
This spring morning, a pristine spin,
I thank the birds for their sweet serenade,
For bringing joy and harmony, a nature-made parade.

Reflection: This was slightly better than the first iteration – “symphony of melodies” is a nice bit of phrasing and I did like the ol’ switcheroo of words in the first line here but “melodic fawn” and “pristine spin” later on as a couplet companions did not work for me — yet ChatGPT’s phrasings still had the wooden rhythm and forced rhyming of a predictive-text poem (which, of course, it is).

Then I took ChatGPT’s revision of the AI Poem Generator output, and asked Google’s Bard AI to revise it even further. As with the other steps, my only instructions were to “revise this poem” without any specific details or parameters.

The results from Bard:

Awakening to Spring

As dawn breaks through the darkness,
I hear the birds’ sweet song,
A melody of hope and joy,
That fills my heart with glee.

The birds chirp and trill,
Their voices rising in the air,
A chorus of praise to nature,
On this beautiful spring morning.

I watch them flutter and sway,
As they dance in the breeze,
A celebration of life,
In all its beauty and wonder.

I close my eyes and listen,
To the music of the birds,
And I am transported to another world,
A world of peace and harmony.

I am grateful for the birds,
And for their gift of song,
A reminder that even in the darkest of times,
There is always hope.

Reflection: OK, so interestingly, Bard added a title without being asked, then avoided the couplet rhyming of the other two chat engines, and went for a more free-flow free-verse style of poem. I liked that, for it make it feel less machine-like. Bard also generated more interesting phrasing – “a chorus of praise to nature” and the last two lines were evocative of something larger in the poem.

And in one final reversal, I took Bard’s poem and asked ChatGPT to critique it as a work of poetry.

The results:

Overall, the poem “Awakening to Spring” paints a vivid and uplifting picture of the arrival of spring through the perspective of the birds’ song. The imagery is clear and evocative, bringing to life the sights and sounds of a spring morning. The poem conveys a sense of renewal, hope, and appreciation for the beauty of nature.

One suggestion for improvement is to consider varying the language and imagery used throughout the poem to add more depth and complexity. For example, instead of using generic terms like “hope” and “joy,” consider using more specific and unique language to create a more distinct and memorable impression. Additionally, you could experiment with different poetic techniques, such as metaphor, simile, or personification, to add layers of meaning and enhance the emotional impact of the poem.

Another suggestion is to pay attention to the rhythm and meter of the poem. While free verse can be effective, incorporating some form of consistent rhythm or meter can add musicality and flow to the poem. This can be achieved through experimenting with syllable count, line length, and the use of poetic devices like alliteration or assonance.

Lastly, consider exploring deeper emotions or themes related to the awakening of spring. The poem touches on hope and gratitude, but there could be an opportunity to delve into more complex emotions or explore deeper philosophical or existential ideas. This could add intellectual and emotional depth to the poem, making it more thought-provoking and resonant with the reader.

Overall, “Awakening to Spring” is a lovely poem that captures the beauty and spirit of spring. With some fine-tuning and further exploration, it has the potential to become an even more powerful and evocative piece of poetry.

Bard thanks you, ChatGPT.

Peace (Poems and Bots),
Kevin

ETMOOC2: Reading/Commenting/Curating Blogs And Posts

ETMOOC2 Curation: Wakelet

I was thankful that Susan gathered together the links of people’s blogs and websites who are participating in ETMOOC2‘s exploration of Artificial Intelligence. I had this idea of curating posts from folks, so I toured through Susan’s link collection.

There were far fewer posts and reflections and inquiry than I would have hoped for in this first week or so of explorations but I decided to set up a Wakelet site to curate what has been posted. I made sure to leave a comment at every blog I read.

I hope to see more posts shared out and will add to my curation as it goes.

Peace (and People),
Kevin

Poem: Pebbles And Verse

This small poem comes from a one-word prompt off Mastodon (collect) and after writing it as text, I envisioned a pool of pebbles with the poems appearing at each of the corner of the image. This was made in Keynote.

Peace (Breaking The Surface),
Kevin

AI Comic: The Last Bot Standing

The Last Bot Standing

In many AI circles these days, there are discussions about the possibility that AI might advance to the point where its decisions might impact humanity in the most terrible ways — as in, complete destruction of society. It stems from our inability to really know how AI is making its decisions, and that unknown factor is cause for concern. That scenario of Ai-induced collapse of society seems far-fetched to me, but that it is even on the radar screen of AI engineers and developers is a bit worrisome, no?

Today’s Daily Create was to make a comic with Make Beliefs comic site (it was a prompt I had submitted some time ago and is being re-used, so that was fun to run into an old prompt) so, given our work in ETMOOC2, it made sense to poke fun at the idea of a sentient AI becoming the “last bot standing.” (AI is not sentient, and I don’t expect it ever be, by the way).

Peace (and Bots),
Kevin

ChatGPT Sorta Knows Me But Bard Doesn’t Seem To

ChatGPT Me2

Forget Googling oneself. I wondered what would happen if I ChatGPT-ed myself. What would it know about me? Sure, it’s narcissistic but I was curious about this new emerging technology.

When I Googled myself (with additional information about “teacher” and “Western Massachusetts” etc) before doing this ChatGPT experiment, I saw links to articles I have written for various publications and assorted media, some of which were me and some of where not me (some other Kevin in the world with shared name). There was no narrative about who I might be, just links that might lead me back to me, somewhere else, online.

When I ChatGPT-ed myself (OK, I need a better term here, particular when Bard and other AIs get in the mix), it actually knew quite a bit about me, and it was quite laudatory in its narrative description (it was some cheerleading to end a long week although I felt embarrassed to read some of it). But it also wrong about a few things, including the so-called books I wrote (I didn’t write those books).

Since I am not sure exactly where it has gathered its information, I assume most of it is from either articles I have written, my blog here, and other open educational spaces where I have long been active.  I’ve left a lot of words in a lot of place over the years. The false reference to those books it says I authored likely came from book reviews I had done on them.

I also asked it about my Dogtrax moniker, and it knew it was me.

ChatGPT About Dogtrax

And I asked it about my blog, and it knew my blog and that I wrote it.

ChatGPT About Blog

When I did similar queries into Google’s Bard Chat AI, it was not much worth of much at all.

First, Bard didn’t know who I was (OK, so maybe that’s a good thing that I am not in its database? I’m not even sure anymore).

Bard on Me

Second, it referenced a teacher/writer with the question about “Who is Dogtrax?”, although not my specific name (now I am thinking maybe searching by name is one of the guardrails of Bard?) but it lumped a reference to me in with someone who wrote a book of poetry (Wait — maybe that’s me, too?) as well as “a dog who runs a popular Instagram account” (which is definitely not me, but now call me curious).

Bard on Dogtrax

Bard seemed to know my blog but said it was Kevin Jarrett (another educational writer) who wrote it. I don’t think Kevin Jarrett had a blog of the same name, and I searched to no avail, but the rest of the references seemed to be about my blog (maybe, it was sort of a generic response). It ended with this as a recommendation: “If you’re looking for a blog that will make you think, laugh, and learn, I highly recommend checking it out.”

Bard on Blog

What do we make of all of this? (I seem to be asking myself this question a lot these days)

One lesson is that if you have been writing out in the open, your words and ideas are likely in the belly of the machine. I searched for my wife’s name and nothing came up, although she, too, is a writer and educator, just not as openly published as I have been. I’ve done that knowingly, which is important to understand as a writer.

It should be a given, too, that you don’t want to search ChatGPT for information about something and think it is all true. But it can give you a snapshot — one data point — that might inform you about something.

Maybe even yourself, if you are curious enough to try.

Peace (and Search),
Kevin

Lines Of Inquiry Guiding Me Into EMOOC2 and Artificial Intelligence

I still need to watch the video archive from the first gathering of ETMOOC2 and a shared exploration of Artificial Intelligence and I am getting myself acclimated to the Discord space where discussions are unfolding along different lines as the open community starts its explorations.

In terms of focus, I am hoping to try to develop some useful resources and lines of inquiry around the concepts of:

  • Helping families of my students navigate this new world of AI in terms of learning, and helping them to better understand what ChatGPT and its many cousins are all about;
  • Developing some elements of professional development for other educators that I might be able to offer in my school district or through my National Writing Project network (through my home site of the Western Massachusetts Writing Project);
  • Grappling with the ethics of young students knowing and using AI tools, even though they are clearly not old enough nor mature enough to comprehend the emotional elements that come from working with technology that appears “sentient” even though it is not;
  • Exploring more intersections of multimedia AI tools, and how they might merge together for artistic expression in a way that is meaningful and navigates the line between the ethical dilemmas of AI (such as ownership of the original material that the AI systems have scraped for its database);
  • Building out a Diigo Outliner of resources that I hope to better curate around main themes of AI and writing and learning. Right now, it’s sort of a mess of links with no real structure or context. (This could fold into the professional development project).

We’ll see how it goes but I hope having some guiding focal points will be helpful for me, particularly as the school year goes into high gear with the end of the year on the horizon in June.

Peace (and Thinking),
Kevin